Search This Blog

Total Pageviews

Advertisement

Labels

Showing posts with label Vanuatu. Show all posts

Special Rapporteur on climate change to visit Vanuatu

GENEVA – The UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights in the context of climate change, Elisa Morgera, will visit Vanuatu from 27 November to 5 December 2024.

Morgera will focus on the adverse effects of sudden and slow onset climate events on human rights, the scope and extent of international climate cooperation and their impacts on human rights, needs for international technical assistance and finance, the role of the business community, and the integration of gender and intersectional perspectives in climate policies and implementation.

The expert will travel to Port Vila and other parts of Efate island, as well as the islands of Pele, Nguna and Tanna, to meet communities affected by climate change. She will also meet Government officials and representatives from civil society.

Morgera will hold a press conference in Port Vila on 5 December at 2 pm local time at the UN Joint Presence Office at the Vanuatu Reserve Bank Building. Access is strictly limited to journalists.

The Special Rapporteur will present her report to the UN Human Rights Council in July 2025.

Ms. Elisa Morgera is the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights in the context of climate change.

The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council's independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures' experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

For more information and media requests, please contact Christel Mobech (mobech@un.org)

For media enquiries regarding other UN independent experts, please Dharisha Indraguptha dharisha.indraguptha@un.org) or John Newland (john.newland@un.org).

Follow news related to the UN’s independent human rights experts on Twitter @UN_SPExperts. 

Weather magic’ and wind lore: the push to preserve ancient knowledge in Vanuatu

Talking dictionaries’ among the tools used by researchers to document languages and record Indigenous environmental knowledge

Jon Letman
Fri 6 Sep 2024 21.00 BST

Joe Natuman watches for falling leaves and new shoots on trees as a sign it’s time to garden. Then, when a southern wind begins to blow in his small village in Vanuatu’s Tafea province, he is the first to plant yams. Soon, others will follow his lead.

Like his forefathers, Natuman is a tupunus, meaning he was born into a lineage that is trained to develop an understanding of how natural forces impact agriculture and wellbeing. As a tupunus, Natuman is respected for his knowledge and ability to identify and use hundreds of plant species and special inherited stones to practise “weather magic”. He also senses winds and uses weather to help his community.

But in Vanuatu, the traditional practice is at risk of fading away. Part of the problem is a loss of local languages and the knowledge that is stored with them. Young people increasingly attend school away from their village and spend less time learning from elders. At the same time, the environment is changing as once easily-found plants become more scarce due to cattle farmingforest degradation and the impact of climate change.


Now, efforts are under way to preserve that knowledge. Botanists and academics in the US and elsewhere are working with communities in Vanuatu to study and record information about the natural diversity in Tafea province, where Natuman lives. They are also researching and documenting the linguistic diversity of the area.

“Loss of this information reduces a community’s ability to cope with the rapid pace of climate change, compromising traditional livelihoods,” say Mike Balick and Greg Plunkett, botanists leading the research in Tafea.

Keeping languages alive

Language is central to the preservation of Indigenous environmental knowledge. Vanuatu has an estimated 138 languages, some only spoken by small groups.

K David Harrison is a professor at the Centre for Environmental Intelligence at Vin University in Vietnam and specialises in endangered languages. Since 2015, Harrison has been working with botanists at the New York Botanical Garden and others to carry out nature surveys in Vanuatu, including the study of nine local languages. Some are spoken by as few as 900 people but have richly nuanced vocabularies describing the natural and spiritual worlds. Many of the concepts are difficult or impossible to translate into English, because equivalents don’t exist.

Working with local communities, Harrison has created eight talking dictionaries that have proved transformative for speakers of the mostly unwritten languages. Their work has continued in recent years, and the researchers have published studies on the links between Indigenous language and environmental knowledge and how that can be used to benefit communities.


‘Tools for survival’

Harrison has also been studying “wind lore” in Vanuatu. It includes the use of “wind compasses” used for wayfinding, which has been observed and documented for centuries. These are not physical objects but rather systems used for naming specific winds. A tupunus will be able to sense how the direction and strength of a wind may indicate the presence of a particular fish species, or favourable crop planting conditions.

Across the Pacific, wind lore and its role in agriculture has not been well documented, Harrison says. In 2017, he travelled to Tafea to record systems of naming and understanding winds and how communities used this knowledge.


While some elders had memorised wind lore, he says, many young people had only fragmented knowledge of what he calls “sophisticated tools for survival”.

Presley Dovo, senior conservation officer with Vanuatu’s Department of Forests, has been working with Harrison and the other researchers to document and record wind knowledge since 2015. “The winds play a vital role in providing information to the people,” Dovo says.

Increasingly inconsistent winds can cause massive disruptions to communities, infrastructure and crops, Dovo adds. He notes that Vanuatu is especially vulnerable to climate and environmental disasters, pointing to devastating back-to-back cyclones in 2023.

Harrison likens the environmental intelligence of Vanuatu to a flexible instrument, able to detect subtle changes. He says it is vital to document and preserve languages and understanding of the environment otherwise unknown to the rest of the world.

“Pacific Island nations can really be seen as a model for Indigenous futures and how Indigenous cultures are going to not only revitalise themselves but make a significant contribution to all of humanity in helping us understand what is happening with the planet.”

Back in Tafea, as the day draws to a close, Natuman sits for an interview over a mobile phone with his son, wife and several curious community members watching from behind.

When the sun starts to go down, Natuman walks to his village nakamal – a sacred gathering place for ceremonies and kava drinking. There, speaking through an interpreter, Natuman extends an invitation to come drink kava and then says goodbye. “I’m going now to talk to my ancestors.”

Supreme Court stays Green Certificate issued on Aniwa

 


The Supreme Court has stayed a Green Certificate issued on December 15 last year over the Sura and Lafatu custom land on Aniwa, pending resolution of an appeal over the land yet to be determined.

This is part of the interim orders issued by Judge William Kenneth Hastings following an urgent ex parte application filed by the claimants, Family Tatuna Totowa and Tousi.

The applicants have filed an appeal against a declaration made by the Imasa and Sukane Joint Nakamal Land Tribunal in 2021 to the Customary Land Management Office (CLMO) on Tanna.

In their urgent application for an interlocutory order filed last week, they claimed that the Acting National Coordinator of the CLMO, John Nalwang, as the first defendant had not acted properly to issue the certificate.

They claimed there is a high conflict of interest in relation to Nalwang’s involvement and the disputes as he is also from Aniwa.

They submitted that their lawyer requested the first defendant on December last year to cancel the Green Certificate issued over Sura custom land as an appeal is yet to be determined by CLMO, but he failed to do so.

He traveled to Aniwa early this month and handed over the Green Certificate, despite the appeal lodged by the applicants and a request from the applicants’ counsel not to issue any Green Certificate over the land. In his ruling, Judge Hastings ordered Nalwang not to issue any Green Certificate for Sura and Lafatu land on Aniwa pending resolution of the appeal.

Nalwang is also restrained from being involved in any dispute over any land on the island of Aniwa whilst in his current position.

Source: VDP

Custom Land Officers for area councils

 


This year, the Customary Land Management Office (CLMO) will appoint community and officers in different area councils across the country.

The Acting National Coordinator, John Nalwang, confirmed this after appointing an officer in Aniwa recently.

According to Mr. Nalwang, the CLMO national coordinator has the authority, under section 9(1) of the Customary Land Management (CLM) Act, to appoint community land officers. This is important for addressing land issues, especially in remote areas where CLMO services are not easily accessible.

The CLMO Act allows the national coordinator to appoint a community land officer only if requested.

1This officer will be a public servant based on the island, serving as both a customary land officer and recording minutes in the Nakamal. CLMO has its officers based in the provincial headquarters, however, it is challenging for the officers to go to the island at times, therefore, the community land officers will be appointed to carry out the responsibilities of the CLMO officers.

While on Aniwa, CLMO officers also confirmed a refresher course was conducted for Aniwa Land Tribunal adjudicators, and Certificates were issued to certify that they are qualified to carry out their role effectively. These adjudicators underwent training in August 2021 but were not given the certificates.

The goal for the CLMO is to bring their services to people’s doorsteps, especially in remote areas, and help local councils resolve Nakamal land cases. Mr. Nalwang explained that if there is a disagreement or unfairness in a Nakamal decision on land, the adjudicators, who are trained under CLMO, can handle the case.

Slipway permit to lapse soon

 The Acting Director of the Department of Environment, Trinison Tarivonda, said the environment permit for the slipway development in Port Vila will lapse this month.

He said the permit was issued last year for nine months, after a Preliminary Environment Assessment (PEA). He said the developer may request the department for extension if work is yet to be completed.

Located in the centre of Port Vila and at the coast, the slipway has caused concerns for environment pollution. A petition calling on the government to stop the development has reached Prime Minister (PM) Charlot Salwai.

The Acting Director said they are in the process of discussing the way forward.

Asked to confirm the possibility of the development causing chemical pollution to the coast as raised by the public, Tarivonda said they need to make more monitoring at the site.

“Environment permits when issued include conditions for companies to follow when carryout activities to safeguard the environment. One of the conditions is to make sure the waste generated must be disposed properly.

“Any water pollution must be managed in a sustainable way. The department will continue monitoring and assessment during operation. Officers have went to the site for follow-ups, but we need to do more monitoring.

“Not only us (DoEPC) but we have to team up with the Department of Water to make water quality test, get results and analyse them,” he said.

As the 2024 year begins, Tarivonda and the Minister of Environment, Ralph Regenvanu, reminded developers about the application process for obtaining a permit for any new development under the Environment Protection and Conservation Act No.6 of 2019.


They explained that any development projects that are likely to cause impact on the environment, society or traditional custom, based on its type, size or location, must comply with the Act and apply for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) permit.

“An application form for the permit must be filled and submitted to the DoEPC. DoEPC officers will then visit the development site and undertake environment assessment to develop a PEA from which a decision is made on whether or not a full EIA is required,” they explained.

“If the DoEPC determines that the development must undergo a full EIA, then the developer will engage a local consultant to do this work.

“Once the EIA report is completed, an environment permit is issued if the report meets and satisfies the required process.

“Any activity carried out without being subjected to the EIA provisions under law or prior to receiving written approval or any such activity where approval has been refused under the provisions of this part, carries a hefty penalty of imprisonment or fine not exceeding VT5 million for an individual and fine not exceeding VT100 million for a corporate body.”

All importers and developers are urged to adhere to permit requirements, as non-compliance will result in issuance of a penalty.

Green Certificate scandal exposed


Since assuming office last October, John Nalwang, the National Coordinator of the Customary Land Management Office (CLMO), has uncovered extensive corrupt practices dating back several years.

Individuals working in government institutions are allegedly involved in these corrupt practices. A common occurrence is the falsification of mapping documents and tampering of Nakamal & Land tribunal minutes.

Nalwang revealed that boundaries are often expanded beyond the original mapping of customary boundaries. This expansion commonly involves areas of financial interest, such as those with investors, lands set aside for government compensation, and project-related lands. He pointed out that the motive behind these actions is to access funds.

One of Nalwang's first tasks was to have CLMO officers in the provinces review maps of customary boundaries within their jurisdictions and pending green certificate applications. It was discovered that advertised maps of custom boundaries differed from the actual boundaries declared to families or custom owners. This difference picked up during their review revealed the expansion of customary boundaries.

This practice was particularly common in Efate and Santo specifically targeted areas involving money. Nalwang cited the Pakona land case near Devil's Point on Efate and Belbura custom land in Santo as an example. He claimed that a former CLMO National Coordinator was removed from office for reinstating the Green Certificate to declared custom owners of that land.

Nalwang noted that the Pakona land issue has allegedly resulted in the termination of several previous national coordinators. Although processes for determining custom ownership have been completed, various obstacles, including alleged conflicts of interest, have hindered progress.

For the Pakona land case, Nalwang highlighted that the original map showed a small piece of land, but boundaries were expanded, particularly in areas with investors. This case is similar to the Belbura land case, which include falsification of land tribunal minutes to obtain a green certificate which failed and is currently under Police investigation. Similar issues were reported near Epule on the North East of Efate.

On the issuance of Green Certificates, Nalwang admitted that CLMO officers failed to cross-check and verify information, leading to inaccuracies in the mapping. The problem extends to areas like Saratamata on Ambae, where custom landowners allegedly extended boundaries to benefit from government compensation.

These issues, identified during the past three months, involve falsification of documents and wrongful issuance of Green Certificates. Nalwang emphasised the need for CLMO officers to verify information in the field before issuing certificates.

The alleged corruption has reportedly been ongoing for nearly a decade, involving government officers and customs landowners in places like, Efate, Santo, Aneityum, Tanna and Erromango. Section 19 (2-3) and 57 of the CLM Act outlines the process for creating recorded interests in land, and Section 11 allows the National Coordinator to cancel a Green Certificate issued based on misleading information.

Nalwang also raised concerns about private lawyers profiting from land cases and providing wrongful advice to custom landowners, leading to legal complications and going in and out of court. He warned that those falsifying information for Green Certificates could face fraud charges.

As a result of these corrupt practices, four CLMO officers are currently under suspension

Source: VDP

USA disagrees with Vanuatu-led resolution, says diplomacy best approach


The United States (U.S.), one of the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases, has disagreed with the Vanuatu-led resolution of seeking an Advisory Opinion (AO) from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the states’ obligation to addressing climate change.

U.S. Deputy Representative to the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), Nicholas Hill, explained his country’s position on the resolution following its recent adoption by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA).

Hill begun his statement by saying that addressing the climate crisis is of the highest priority for U.S., both domestically and internationally. He said the climate crisis is at the center of its foreign policy and diplomacy.

He mentioned the U.S. is focused on mobilizing resources to support developing countries as they address the climate crisis, and is also on minimizing the risks of sea level rise for small islands and low-lying states, and working to address its impacts through its policies and support.

“In this context, the United States has engaged in discussions on this resolution with a view to consider how best we can advance our collective efforts,” said the Deputy U.S. Representative to ECOSOC.

“We have considered this carefully, recognising the priority that Vanuatu and other Small Island Developing States have placed on seeking an advisory opinion from ICJ with the aim of advancing progress towards climate goals.

“However, we have serious concerns that this process could complicate our collective efforts and will not bring us closer to achieving these shared goals. We believe that launching a judicial process-especially given the broad scope of the questions-will likely accentuate disagreements and not be conducive to advancing ongoing diplomatic and negotiation process. In light of these concerns, the U.S. disagrees that this initiative is the best approach for achieving our goals, and takes this opportunity to reaffirm our view that diplomatic efforts are the best means by which to address the climate crisis.


“While we recognise this process will go forward in light of the significant support for the resolution, we underscore our continuing belief that successfully tackling the climate crisis is best achieved through doubling down on the types of diplomatic efforts that we are engaged in, including multilateral engagement under the Paris Agreement and other fora, plurilateral initiatives, and bilateral efforts that advance solutions to the multifaceted challenges caused by the climate crisis.

“The U.S. will welcome the opportunity to share our legal views and engage with states and the Court on the question posed.”

Another biggest greenhouse emitter in the world, China, welcomed the resolution however it has reservation regarding the draft text itself. The representative from China explained that this reservation is that the text operative paragraphs do not reflect the principles of equity, common but differentiated responsibility, and respective capabilities.

“China believes that the ICJ when discussing the issue of climate change should respect the status of the Convention as the main channel, safeguard the principles of the Framework Convention and Paris Agreement and assist with advancing their implementation, rather than interfering with the global climate governance process,” the representative stated.

Both China and USA did not object, but allowed the resolution to be adopted. The resolution gained overwhelming support from the UN members and was considered a landmark.

Source: Daily Post Vanuatu

‘Beginning of a new era’: Pacific islanders hail UN vote on climate justice

Resolution asks ICJ to clarify countries’ obligations to fight climate change and the consequences they should face for inaction

Members of Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change at a protest during the COP27 UN summit in Egypt. The group has celebrated the passing of a UN resolution calling for legal clarification of state obligations on climate. Photograph: Nariman El-Mofty/AP

A group of Pacific Island students who were instrumental in pushing a UN resolution that should make it easier to hold polluting countries legally accountable for failure to act on the climate crisis have greeted its adoption as historic.

“Young people across the world will recall the day when we were able to get the world’s highest court, the international court of justice, to bring its voice to the climate justice fight,” said Solomon Yeo, campaign director of Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change (PISFCC), who is from Solomon Islands.

The resolution calls for the international court of justice (ICJ) to issue an opinion clarifying nations’ obligations to tackle the climate crisis and the consequences they should face for inaction.

“I don’t want to show a picture to my child one day of my island. I want my child to be able to experience the same environment and the same culture that I grew up in,” said Cynthia Houniuhi, also of Solomon Islands and who is president of PISFCC. “The environment that sustains us is disintegrating before our eyes.”

Frustrated by the world’s lack of action on climate change, law students in eight Pacific island nations founded PISFCC in 2019 and launched their campaign to persuade their leaders to take the resolution to the UN’s highest court.

Spearheaded by Vanuatu, Pacific nations soon took up the law students’ call.

Pacific Island nations are at risk of rising seas engulfing swathes of the islands. Scientists say both extreme weather and sea levels have worsened because of climate change caused by the burning of fossil fuels. The resolution asks the court to pay particular attention to the harm endured by small island states.

Vanuatu Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau greeted the resolution as “a win for climate justice of epic proportions.”

“Today’s historic resolution is the beginning of a new era in multilateral climate cooperation, one that is more fully focused on upholding the rule of international law and an era that places human rights and intergenerational equity at the forefront of climate decision-making,” he said.

UN secretary general António Guterres said he hoped the opinion, when issued, would encourage nations “to take the bolder and stronger climate action that our world so desperately needs”.

While the opinion from the ICJ will not be binding, it will encourage states “to actually go back and look at what they haven’t been doing and what they need to do” to address the climate emergency, said Nilufer Oral, director at the Center for International Law at the University of Singapore.

The court has other power it can bring to bear, Christopher Bartlett, climate diplomacy manager for the government of Vanuatu, explained. The court can reference other international legal instruments, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and those do have the force of law for the countries that have ratified them.

“The international court of justice is the only legal authority that has a mandate to look at all of international law. While the advisory opinion itself is not binding, the laws upon which the advisory opinion will be speaking absolutely are legally binding and immediately applicable to states,” said Bartlett.

Bartlett said that some of the questions the ICJ will ask include: what harm to the climate has been done? Should states be forced to take certain actions? And is financial support a legal consequence of causing harm?

The resolution now goes to the court.

Countries have agreed to aim to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius with an upper limit of 2 degrees Celsius back in 2015 as part of the Paris Agreement. The agreement asks countries to submit their plans to curb greenhouse gases to the UN and regularly revise and update those plans.

Clarifying those obligations for states, as well as other promises to protect biodiversity and strengthen domestic policies are the main aims of the advisory opinion, said Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu’s climate change minister.

“We are also clear eyed that existing international frameworks have significant gaps,” he said, adding that the opinion could push for stronger legal measures like negotiating a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty or criminalising “climate destroying activities”. lionaire owner, meaning we can fearlessly chase the truth and report it with integrity. 2023 will be no different; we will work with trademark determination and passion to bring you journalism that’s always free from commercial or political interference. No one edits our editor or diverts our attention from what’s most important. 

With your support, we’ll continue to keep Guardian journalism open and free for everyone to read. When access to information is made equal, greater numbers of people can understand global events and their impact on people and communities. Together, we can demand better from the powerful and fight for democracy.


Pacific projectPacific islands

Australia joins Vanuatu's campaign to push for consequences for climate-harming countries through the ICJ

 By foreign affairs reporter Stephen Dziedzic

Posted updated 

‘We are very vulnerable’: cyclone-hit Vanuatu pins climate hopes on UN vote

Pacific nation is sponsoring resolution that will ask ICJ to rule on consequences for climate inaction

A boy walks through through the ruins of his family home in Port Vila, Vanuatu after Cyclone Pam devastated the town in 2015. The Pacific country has co-sponsored a resolution on climate obligations at the UN. Photograph: Getty Images

Last month, twin cyclones tore through Port Vila, the capital of the Pacific nation of Vanuatu. The category-four storms left corrugated iron roofs crumpled like leftover wrapping paper, flooded the streets with waste-ridden mud, cut residents off from water and electricity for several days, and sent many fleeing to hastily established evacuation centres.

Devastation of this sort is becoming more common throughout the Pacific, where rising sea levels are leaving shorelines increasingly vulnerable to extreme weather made more intense by climate change.

It is partly because of such crises that Vanuatu has introduced a resolution to the UN, co-sponsored by more than 100 other nations and set to be voted on this week, calling for the international court of justice (ICJ) to set out for the first time the obligations states have under international law to fight climate change, and specify any consequences they should face for inaction.

The resolution emerged out of frustration with the mismatch between the global community’s rhetoric and action on climate change, which routinely left Pacific activists and diplomats feeling “very disillusioned and disappointed”, says Kevin Chand, the legal adviser to Vanuatu’s mission to the United Nations. The global community “has been making progress, but it isn’t making progress fast enough when we in the Pacific are very vulnerable to climatic events”.

Advisory opinions by the ICJ are not binding on domestic courts. By establishing international legal rules, however, they can be influential sources of pressure on judges and governments. Vanuatu hopes an advisory opinion that sets out stricter climate obligations would strengthen climate-related lawsuits around the world and empower vulnerable nations in international climate negotiations.

Vanuatu already appears to have won majority support for its proposal, which is scheduled for a vote in the UN general assembly on Wednesday; 117 nations are co-sponsoring the draft resolution.

The campaign to secure an advisory opinion began four years ago in a classroom at the Fijian campus of the University of the South Pacific, where several law students were debating how best to draw the plight of their Pacific homelands to global attention. After striking upon the idea of an advisory opinion, they began lobbying their governments to support it.

Previous attempts by the Marshall Islands, Palau, and Bangladesh to seek an advisory opinion had stalled. But Pacific nations soon took up the law students’ call. They gradually won support from other small nations in Africa and the Caribbean, then secured the backing of more ambitious developed nations.

Vanuatu avoided singling out individual countries in its request to the ICJ, which has helped it draw support from large emitters like the UK and Australia. Other influential nations like the US and China have not yet expressed a public opinion on the proposal, but one person involved in the negotiations who spoke on condition of anonymity says both countries have indicated they would support it.

The person believes that Vanuatu’s campaign had been aided by the Pacific’s growing geostrategic prominence as the US and China compete for influence in the region. “Politics in the Pacific is very charged at the moment. It’s worked in our favour because it means that we have some leverage,” they say. “It gives us some opportunity to make moves like this because the big players don’t want to offend the Pacific Islands.”

Meanwhile, as these international debates play out, several thousand people in Vanuatu are still living in evacuation centres after the damage wreaked across their country by the twin cyclones. For them, advocates say, an advisory opinion strengthening the obligations on large emitters cannot come soon enough.

“Extreme weather events are becoming the new normal in our country as a result of climate change,” says Odo Tevi, Vanuatu’s ambassador to the UN. “For low-lying countries, it’s an existential threat.” Accordingly, says Tevi, “We need the global community to act.”


How a small island got world’s highest court to take on climate justice

By

Updated March 29, 2023 at 3:04 p.m. EDT|Published March 29, 2023 at 11:48 a.m. EDT

An uprooted tree blocks a road after Cyclone Judy made landfall in 
Port Vila, Vanuatu. (Jean-Baptiste Jeangene Vilmer/AFP/Getty Images)

The small Pacific island nation of Vanuatu won a major victory to advance international climate law Wednesday after it persuaded the U.N. General Assembly to ask the world’s highest international court to rule on the obligations of countries to address climate change.

The request for an advisory ruling from the International Court of Justice is expected to clarify the legal obligations of countries to address climate change — and to create a path for them to be sued if they fail to do so. The U.N. effort was a significant outcome for Vanuatu, an archipelago nation of 320,000 people that is suffering from climate-change-driven natural disasters. In recent weeks, it was hit by two Category 4 cyclones, the severity of which its leaders blamed on global warming. Thousands of people are still living in shelters.

The country has used its moral authority and ability to stage action at the United Nations to achieve outsize results on climate issues. The U.N. General Assembly approved the measure by acclamation, with neither the United States nor China standing in the way of the effort despite uncertainty in advance whether they would seek a formal up-or-down vote.

 Wednesday’s decision was also a measure of how much global attitudes about the urgency of addressing climate change have shifted in recent years. A similar effort in 2011 by two other island nations, Palau and the Marshall Islands, failed at the United Nations. This time, Vanuatu obtained co-sponsorship from more than 120 countries, including Britain, France, Germany and other industrialized nations with a long history of high emissions.

“It is a matter of basic survival for us,” Vanuatu Climate Change Minister Ralph Regenvanu said in an interview. “We can’t do anything economically and politically because we don’t have any power. What we can use is our sovereignty as a United Nations member state.”
 

What’s an advisory opinion?

The International Court of Justice, which is based in The Hague, typically rules on disputes between countries. But it also issues advisory opinions that interpret how existing international agreements apply to new issues. Those opinions are not binding on national courts, but they can be used to pressure governments and courtrooms and to create pathways for future lawsuits.
Advertisement

“An opinion would assist the General Assembly, the U.N. and member states to take the bolder and stronger climate action that our world so desperately needs,” U.N. Secretary General António Guterres told the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday ahead of the decision.

“It could also guide the actions and conduct of states in their relations with each other, as well as towards their own citizens,” he said. 

Having the International Court of Justice weigh in creates a “pretty clear pathway to recognizing that states have a duty not only not to violate fundamental human rights, but states have a duty to avoid transboundary harm through activities under their control,” said Carroll Muffett, president of the Center for International Environmental Law, a D.C.-based nonprofit that works to use international law to address ecological issues.

He compared an advisory ruling to consulting a lawyer while being engaged in behavior that falls in a legal gray zone.

“It’s like when you send a note to your lawyer, and you get a lawyer’s note back saying what you’re doing is illegal,” he said. “It puts you on notice that you could be held accountable for your actions.”

“It is hard to overstate the significance of this development as a matter of international law,” he added.
Vanuatu’s campaign

As Vanuatu gained support for the U.N. action, it was careful to try to build consensus, with its leaders saying they are not suing anyone nor seeking to create new international obligations. Instead, they say, they are seeking to clarify how preexisting international agreements apply to climate change.

“We believe the clarity it will bring can greatly benefit our efforts to address the climate crisis, and could further bolster global and multilateral cooperation,” Vanuatu Prime Minister Alatoi Ishmael Kalsakau told the assembly.

Neither the United States, which is the world’s largest historical emitter, nor China — which is soon poised to overtake the United States on that count — opposed the measure. The two superpowers have been competing for influence among Pacific island nations as they seek to project power across that ocean, giving the small countries outsize leverage despite their minuscule economies and populations.

But even as the United States stood aside and allowed the referral to be approved without objection, a U.S. diplomat also said the Biden administration believes diplomacy is a better way to achieve action on climate issues than inside a courtroom.

“Launching a judicial process, especially given the broad scope of the questions, will likely accentuate disagreements and not be conducive to advancing our ongoing diplomatic and other processes. In light of these concerns, the United States disagrees that this initiative is the best approach for achieving our shared goals,” diplomat Nicholas Hill told the General Assembly after the measure was approved, speaking on behalf of the State Department.

Vanuatu’s policymakers said they had tried to craft their work in a way that would win broad acceptance.

“We have deliberately tried to make this as noncontentious as possible,” Regenvanu said. “Once we get the question before the court, then the process of submissions begins, and there might be a slight change of tactic there. Because obviously we want the highest level ambition in that opinion.”



The effort began four years ago in a classroom at the University of the South Pacific in Fiji. Law students there decided that an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice could be an effective tool to advance climate justice. They worked to convince their governments to follow suit.

Vanuatu has also promoted a global fossil fuel nonproliferation treaty, advocating a total phaseout of oil, coal and gas as quickly as possible. And it has been a leader on international efforts to create a system to compensate the worst-hit countries for “loss and damage” from climate change.

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com

 
 
 

Vanuatu Braces for Another Cyclone Following Judy’s Devastation

By Anita Roberts Mar 3, 2023, Vanuatu Daily Post


Just one day after being battered by Tropical Cyclone (TC) Judy, Vanuatu is bracing itself for a second cyclone which is intensifying with the possibility of developing into a category 3 system.


Tropical Cyclone (TC) Kevin will bring more destruction while the people are still cleaning-up after category 3 TC Judy. Some homes have not been rebuilt and the government is yet to assess the widespread damage.


Warnings have already been issued for strong winds, heavy rainfalls and rough swells before the occurrence of TC Kevin.


The severe weather has triggered suspension of both domestic and international flights while ships, boats and small fishing rafts are advised not to go out to sea.


Some essential services like the banks will be temporarily closed today. Disruptions to electricity and telecommunication services are possible and government workers will resume work once the situation is declared all clear.


As of yesterday night, a Red Alert has been issued for SANMA, MALAMPA and PENAMA Provinces, Yellow Alert for TORBA and SHEFA.


Originated south of Solomon Islands, TC Kevin was upgraded to category 2 yesterday. As of yesterday night, it was positioned about 330km west of Santo and 430km west northwest of Malekula.


According to the Manager of the Weather Forecast Section, Fred Jockley, the cyclone will pass near the central and southern parts of Vanuatu.


It is likely the system will develop into a category 2 system and will further strengthen into a category 3 system, he said. He added that the system is expected to make landfall on Tanna on Saturday, tomorrow.


The cyclone is expected to leave Vanuatu water by tomorrow.


According to Weather Forecast Manager Jockley, this is not the first time for them to issue warnings for two systems in Vanuatu’s area of responsibility simultaneously.


People are advised to take precautions and follow advices from the Vanuatu Meteorology and Geo-Hazards Department (VMGD) and the National Disaster Management Office (NDMO) to keep safe.


Meanwhile, the extent of the damage from the two systems will be known once the government make a full assessment. Based on initial reports, there is widespread damage to buildings, homes and crops in affected areas.